CELPIP [Tough] Reading Practice Test 6 (With Answers)
Check out this extremely difficult CELPIP READING PRACTICE TEST 6 by HZad Education. The answers are included! How will you fare against this challenging CELPIP reading mock test? Let’s find out!
Also, this is part 5 of the reading practice test. For more CELPIP reading practice tests, subscribe to our blog.
CELPIP READING PART 1:
10 minutes:
Dear Ms. Thompson,
I am writing to provide an exhaustive evaluation of Mr. Alexander Grant, whom I have had the distinct pleasure of supervising directly for the past six years at Nexus Innovations, where we specialize in cutting-edge technological solutions for the aerospace industry. Alexander joined our company as a secondary aeronautical engineer immediately after completing his Master’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, graduating summa cum laude with a focus on propulsion systems.
From the outset, Alexander displayed an exceptional aptitude for complex problem-solving and a profound understanding of advanced aerodynamics, which was evident when he significantly contributed to Project Orion by optimizing the thrust vector control mechanisms, resulting in a 15% increase in fuel efficiency—a feat that earned him the “Innovator of the Year” award in his first year. His ability to assimilate intricate technical information and apply it practically was further demonstrated during the development of the Hermes Satellite Program, where he led a multidisciplinary team of engineers, physicists, and software developers to successfully design and launch a satellite communication system that exceeded performance benchmarks by 25%. In addition to his technical prowess, Alexander possesses outstanding leadership qualities. He was instrumental in mentoring new recruits through the company’s Engineering Excellence Initiative, a program he helped design to accelerate the onboarding process and enhance skill development among junior staff. His commitment to fostering a collaborative work environment is evident in his regular facilitation of cross-departmental workshops, focusing on integrating mechanical engineering principles with advanced computational simulations to streamline project workflows.
In considering any areas for development, it is worth noting that Alexander’s relentless pursuit of perfection can sometimes lead him to invest additional time refining project details, which, while enhancing the final output, may occasionally extend timelines. However, this meticulous attention to detail is a valuable asset, particularly in our industry where precision is paramount.
On a personal level, Alexander is known for his unwavering professionalism, integrity, and dedication. He consistently demonstrates a strong work ethic, often working beyond regular hours to ensure project deadlines are met without compromising quality. His colleagues appreciate his approachable demeanor and willingness to assist others, which has cultivated a positive and productive team dynamic. Outside of work, he volunteers with the STEM Outreach Program, inspiring high school students to pursue careers in science and engineering.
Alexander’s contributions are not limited to internal projects; he has authored ten research papers published in prestigious journals such as the Journal of Propulsion and Power and the International Journal of Aerospace Engineering. His paper on “Advanced Composite Materials for High-Temperature Applications” has been cited over 200 times and has influenced industry standards for material usage in extreme conditions. Furthermore, he represented Nexus Innovations at the International Aerospace Conference in Berlin, where he delivered a keynote speech on sustainable aerospace technologies, showcasing his exceptional communication skills and thought leadership.
In conclusion, I wholeheartedly endorse Alexander Grant for any senior engineering position or leadership role. His exceptional technical expertise, coupled with his leadership abilities and dedication to excellence, make him an outstanding candidate who will undoubtedly make significant contributions to any organization he joins.
Sincerely,
Dr. Elizabeth Carter
Chief Engineering Officer
Nexus Innovations
Questions:
- The main purpose of Dr. Carter’s letter is to:
a. Recommend Alexander.
b. Provide an evaluation of Alexander.
c. Highlight Alexander’s strengths.
d. Announce Alexander’s recommendation. - Alexander’s initial role at Nexus Innovations was as a:
a. Senior aeronautical engineer.
b. Propulsion systems manager.
c. Junior aeronautical engineer.
d. Lead engineer for the Hermes Satellite Program. - Which statement best describes Alexander’s contributions to the company?
a. He focused on group assignments.
b. He preferred working in teams.
c. His leadership skills were useful.
d. He delegated effectively. - Dr. Carter mentions that Alexander’s attention to detail:
a. Positively impacts project deadlines.
b. Results in additional time spent.
c. Causes ease among his team members.
d. Has a significantly good effect on the overall project quality. - Alexander’s ability to communicate complex ideas is:
a. Limited to written research papers.
b. Appropriate to business relations.
c. Perfect for technical stakeholders.
d. Relevant to the subject audience.
Please read the response letter below and answer questions 6 to 10:
Dear Elizabeth,
Thank you for your comprehensive and insightful evaluation of Alexander Grant. From your detailed account, it is evident that Alexander and your team have 6. (applied his skills / shared common challenges in project management / faced progress due to his meticulous nature / exploited his expertise and leadership).
Considering our organization’s emphasis on innovation and 7. (strict adherence to project timelines / fostering collaborative teamwork / prioritizing team achievements / limiting research publications), Alexander’s 8. (ease of communication / approachable attitude / focus on refining project details / commitment to clear descriptions), as highlighted by you, appears particularly valuable for our initiatives.
Our projects often require team members to 9. (communicate the right terms / break down information with detail / relay information correctly among people and groups / avoid overcomplicating project terms). Therefore, his ability to 10. (convey technical information / communicate effectively / relay information correctly / break down information with detail) will be crucial in achieving our objectives.
I appreciate your thorough recommendation. Your insights will greatly assist us in considering Alexander for the position.
Best regards,
Maria Thompson
Director of Human Resources
AeroTech Solutions
Answers:
- b. Provide an evaluation of Alexander.
Dr. Carter’s letter is intended to offer an exhaustive assessment and endorsement of Alexander’s skills and accomplishments. - c. Junior aeronautical engineer.
Alexander began as a secondary aeronautical engineer immediately after completing his Master’s degree. - c. His leadership skills were useful.
Alexander mentored new recruits, led teams, and fostered a collaborative environment. - b. Results in additional time spent.
His meticulousness leads to high-quality work, even if it sometimes extends timelines. - b. Appropriate to business relations.
His communication skills are effective with both technical and non-technical stakeholders, making them appropriate for business relations. - Applied his skills
Alexander’s team has significantly benefited from his skills and leadership qualities. - Fostering collaborative teamwork
The organization values collaboration, aligning with Alexander’s strengths in teamwork and mentorship. - Ease of communication
Alexander’s skill in communicating complex ideas is particularly valuable. - Communicate the right terms
Their projects require team members to communicate effectively. - Convey technical information
His ability to explain complex concepts is crucial for the organization’s objectives.
CELPIP READING PART 2:
Hey Alex,
I see you’re all set on buying those cool gadgets you’ve been eyeing. But before you go crazy spending, let’s just double-check a few things, shall we? I know how much you’re into the new 1. (thought interface/emotion recognition/thought-controlled interface/voice-activated) technology, but the smart helmet has a more basic feature, though it does come with 2. (a navigation system/voice recognition/activity tracking/vision display), which the others don’t have—and you’ll definitely need that for your hikes!
For your robotics hobby, that robot assistant is something else! If you want to keep things running smoothly, the 3. (gesture control/expression recognition/clue detection/activity recognition) feature will blow you away. Now, when it comes to raw strength, the exoskeleton is unbeatable. However, double-check whether it comes with 4. (biofeedback analysis/strength-boosting motors/rapid reflex/muscle fatigue detectors) before you buy.
I know you’re not too keen on instruction manuals, but with the 5. (AI-powered/self-learning algorithms/automated command system/voice assistant) in place, you won’t have to worry about figuring things out on your own. But, just make sure not to break it—it’s expensive stuff!
Cheers,
Jonathan
Questions:
- What does Alex most likely prefer in the smart helmet?
a. Emotion recognition
b. Thought-controlled interface
c. Voice-activated commands
d. Thought interface - According to Jonathan, what feature sets the robot assistant apart?
a. Gesture control
b. Clue detection
c. Expression recognition
d. Activity recognition - What can be said about Alex?
a. He can be lazy
b. He can get too excited
c. He needs to read things twice
d. He is planning ahead
Answers:
- b. Thought-controlled interface
(Jonathan knows Alex is into the thought-controlled interface technology, which the smart helmet has.) - a. Navigation system
(The smart helmet has a real-time navigation system that’s useful for Alex’s hiking adventures.) - c. Expression recognition
(Jonathan highlights the robot assistant’s “emotion detection” feature, suggesting it will impress Alex.) - b. Muscle fatigue detectors
(Jonathan suggests Alex check whether the exoskeleton comes with muscle fatigue detectors for better performance.) - c. Automated command system
(Jonathan mentions the “automated command system,” ensuring Alex doesn’t have to worry about manual instructions.) - b. Thought-controlled interface
(The smart helmet’s notable feature that Alex would prefer is the thought-controlled interface.) - c. Expression recognition
(Jonathan is excited about the robot assistant’s expression recognition feature, which sets it apart.) - b. He can get too excited
(Jonathan mentions “but before you go crazy spending, let’s just double-check a few things”)
_______
Why do students fail CELPIP? This course not only explains that but GUARANTEES your results or your MONEY-BACK! With 100,000 copies sold, check out why this course has internet’s best reviews (IMMEDIATE ACCESS AVAILABLE): https://hzadeducation.com/product/classes-celpip/
BEST FREE CELPIP Videos and Advice: https://www.youtube.com/@hzadeducation-coachingcent986
________
CELPIP READING PART 3:
Passage:
- A. Crime rates fluctuate over time and are influenced by a variety of social, economic, and political factors. Studies have shown that poverty and unemployment are often linked to higher rates of crime, particularly in urban areas. Additionally, income inequality tends to exacerbate these issues, as people in disadvantaged communities may turn to illegal activities to support themselves. Law enforcement agencies have implemented various measures to address these concerns, such as community policing, which seeks to build relationships between police officers and residents to create safer neighborhoods. However, some critics argue that these efforts do not address the root causes of crime, leaving underlying social inequalities unchallenged.
- B. Cybercrime has emerged as a major threat in the digital age, with hackers targeting individuals, corporations, and even governments. Cybercriminals use techniques like phishing, malware, and ransomware to steal sensitive information or disrupt services. The rise of cryptocurrencies has made it easier for cybercriminals to receive anonymous payments, further complicating efforts to combat online crime. Law enforcement agencies around the world are struggling to keep pace with rapidly evolving cyber threats, and international cooperation is often required to bring perpetrators to justice. However, the borderless nature of the internet makes prosecuting cybercriminals particularly difficult.
- C. Organized crime syndicates, such as drug cartels and human trafficking networks, operate across national borders, making them difficult to dismantle. These groups often rely on corruption to maintain their power, infiltrating law enforcement, politics, and the judiciary to protect their operations. In some regions, organized crime has become so entrenched that it is nearly impossible to distinguish between legitimate institutions and criminal enterprises. Governments have attempted to combat organized crime through military intervention, stricter laws, and international cooperation, but these efforts are often met with limited success due to the scale of the problem and the immense resources available to criminal organizations.
- D. White-collar crime refers to financially motivated, nonviolent crimes typically committed by business professionals or public officials. These offenses can include fraud, embezzlement, insider trading, and bribery. While white-collar criminals do not usually engage in physical violence, their actions can have widespread economic consequences, causing significant financial losses for individuals, companies, and even entire economies. Because white-collar crimes are often complex and involve sophisticated financial transactions, they can be challenging to detect and prosecute. In recent years, there has been growing public pressure for harsher penalties for white-collar criminals, who are often perceived as receiving lenient sentences compared to those convicted of violent crimes.
- E. Not Given.
Match the following questions with the corresponding paragraphs above. Put ‘E’ where the statement is not given.
- A practice aimed at forming local bonds to lower crime.
- Criminal acts that cross borders and involve hidden power.
- A specific type of crime using the internet.
- A method that allows criminals to avoid detection for various gains.
- An activity driven by economic hardship.
- Anonymous tools making it hard to stop criminals.
- A concern where criminals infiltrate legitimate systems to stay safe.
- Financial misconduct by professionals harming various sectors.
- A reference to crime involving digital anonymity.
Answers:
- A (Community policing… seeks to build relationships between police officers and residents to create safer neighborhoods…)
- C (Organized crime syndicates, such as drug cartels and human trafficking networks, operate across national borders…)
- B (Cybercriminals use techniques like phishing, malware, and ransomware to steal sensitive information or disrupt services…)
- D (White-collar crime… involves sophisticated financial transactions… often complex and challenging to detect…)
- A (Poverty and unemployment are often linked to higher rates of crime, particularly in urban areas…)
- B (The rise of cryptocurrencies has made it easier for cybercriminals to receive anonymous payments…)
- C (Organized crime… rely on corruption to maintain their power, infiltrating law enforcement, politics, and the judiciary…)
- D (White-collar crimes… causing significant financial losses for individuals, companies, and even entire economies…)
- E (Not Given)
CELPIP READING PART 4:
Passage:
The ongoing debate about the purpose of university education has sparked considerable discussion in recent years. Dr. Helen Martinez, a sociologist and education theorist, believes that universities should shift away from purely academic pursuits and instead focus on preparing students for the practical realities of the job market. Martinez argues that the current system places too much emphasis on theoretical knowledge and research, which often leaves students unprepared for the professional world. She asserts that universities must adapt to the demands of a rapidly changing economy by offering more vocational training and internships, which would equip students with the practical skills they need to succeed. According to Martinez, the disconnect between what students learn in the classroom and what is required in the workplace is one of the main reasons for the high levels of unemployment among recent graduates.
Martinez further contends that this academic-focused model of education tends to privilege certain types of knowledge while marginalizing others. She points out that many universities prioritize subjects such as philosophy, history, and literature—fields that she believes offer little direct value in today’s job market—over technical skills and applied sciences. She advocates for a curriculum overhaul that focuses on developing critical job skills, such as communication, teamwork, and problem-solving, which she claims are in high demand but often underrepresented in traditional academic programs. Martinez concludes that unless universities take steps to address these shortcomings, they will continue to produce graduates who struggle to transition into meaningful employment.
Dr. Samuel Wright, an educational traditionalist, offers a starkly different viewpoint. Wright insists that the primary role of universities is not to act as job training centers but to foster intellectual growth and cultivate a deeper understanding of the world. He argues that education should be about more than just preparing students for the workforce; it should also encourage them to think critically, engage with complex ideas, and challenge established norms. According to Wright, a well-rounded education that includes philosophy, history, and literature is essential to developing informed and thoughtful citizens who can contribute meaningfully to society. He believes that focusing solely on vocational training would undermine the broader purpose of higher education and reduce it to a mere transaction, where students are trained to fill specific job roles without understanding the larger societal context.
Wright also points out that many of the most successful leaders in business and politics studied fields unrelated to their eventual careers, proving that a broad education can be a powerful tool in developing versatile and adaptable individuals. He asserts that, rather than reducing the focus on the humanities, universities should reinforce their importance and continue to emphasize intellectual exploration over job-market preparation. Wright concludes that while job skills are important, the role of the university should remain centered on intellectual development and the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake.
Questions:
- Dr. Martinez’s main concern about university education is its:
a. Focus on theoretical knowledge
b. Lack of practical learning
c. Emphasis on abstract concepts
d. Disconnect from workplace needs - According to Martinez, the current university model:
a. Lacks vocational adaptability
b. Overlooks essential job preparation
c. Ignores practical work skills
d. Privileges irrelevant knowledge - Dr. Wright believes that universities should focus on:
a. Developing intellectual depth
b. Preparing students for work
c. Fostering job-specific skills
d. Building societal contributions - Martinez argues that certain academic subjects:
a. Offer little workplace utility
b. Are overrepresented in universities
c. Fail to provide career readiness
d. Undermine the value of education - Wright’s stance on vocational training is that it:
a. Reduces intellectual exploration
b. Limits career opportunities
c. Hinders broad education
d. Shifts focus from knowledge
Reader’s Comment:
The debate between Martinez and Wright is insightful, but it fails to consider the (economic/social/global/cultural) (6) consequences of changing university education. I find myself agreeing more with Martinez, as I see how (vocational programs/academic research/internship placements/job-market training) (7) can directly impact students’ career readiness. What both fail to discuss is the role of (broader knowledge/technical training/general education/critical thinking) (8) in creating adaptable professionals. While Wright makes a valid argument for the importance of intellectual development, the focus should be on (balancing academic theory/incorporating practical training/providing job skills/expanding educational options) (9) to help students succeed. A better approach might be for universities to (redesign curricula/emphasize humanities/strengthen applied sciences/adapt programs to industries) (10) to meet the needs of both intellectual growth and career preparation.
Answers:
- Answer: d. Disconnect from workplace needs
Explanation: Dr. Martinez argues that universities focus too much on academic knowledge and neglect practical skills, leading to a disconnect between education and the workplace. - Answer: b. Overlooks essential job preparation
Explanation: Martinez believes the current university model doesn’t adequately prepare students for the workforce, focusing more on academic learning than on essential job skills. - Answer: a. Developing intellectual depth
Explanation: Dr. Wright argues that universities should emphasize intellectual exploration and critical thinking rather than focusing on preparing students for specific jobs. - Answer: a. Offer little workplace utility
Explanation: Martinez argues that subjects like philosophy, literature, and history offer limited value in terms of practical career skills in today’s job market. - Answer: a. Reduces intellectual exploration
Explanation: Wright believes that vocational training, if overly emphasized, would detract from the broader intellectual exploration that universities should provide. - Answer: d. Cultural
Explanation: The reader implies that changing the university system has significant cultural implications, particularly in how society values knowledge versus job readiness. - Answer: d. Job-market training
Explanation: The reader sides with Martinez, believing that job-market training is essential for improving students’ career prospects after university. - Answer: b. Technical training
Explanation: The reader suggests that technical training is crucial for producing adaptable professionals in today’s rapidly changing job market. - Answer: b. Incorporating practical training
Explanation: The reader believes that the focus should be on balancing academic theory with practical training to create well-rounded graduates. - Answer: d. Adapt programs to industries
Explanation: The reader proposes that universities should adapt their programs to the needs of various industries to better align intellectual development with career readiness.
FOR MORE CELPIP READING MOCK TESTS AND CHALLENGING QUESTIONS:
What is CELPIP?
CELPIP is similar to IELTS in a way that is an English language test accepted by the Canadian government for immigration purposes. You can use your CELPIP score to apply for immigration through programs like Express Entry and PGWP, as it assesses your English proficiency in speaking, listening, reading, and writing. A high CELPIP score can improve your chances of being invited to apply for immigration.
To further your prep, we highly recommend you go with the best online CELPIP course that teaches you everything step-by-step (basic to advanced modules), with exam-like mock tests!